Blog

Evidence, admissibility, and blockchain-anchored timestamps

Articles on FRE 901(b)(9), Daubert, chain of custody for digital evidence, pre-loss documentation, and the technical mechanics of blockchain anchoring.

• Pre-Loss Video Evidence Could Have Prevented Property Damage Dispute (Hypothetical)

  April 21, 2026

  > **Hypothetical scenario — illustrative only. Not based on a specific customer engagement.**…

• Chain of Custody for Digital Evidence: Why Immutable Timestamps Matter More Than Ever

  April 20, 2026

  The defense attorney stood up during the hearing. "Your Honor, we move to exclude these photographs. The plaintiff claims they show pre-loss conditions, but there's no way to verify when they were act…

• Chain of Custody for Digital Evidence: How to Prove Your Video Wasn't Faked

  April 20, 2026

  An insurance adjuster receives dashcam footage from a policyholder claiming another driver ran a red light. The video looks authentic. The timestamp shows it was recorded before the claim was filed. B…

• Federal Rule 901(b)(9): Why Blockchain Timestamps Are Self-Authenticating Evidence

  April 18, 2026

  I'll provide the legal explainer content directly:…

• Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(9): Why Blockchain Timestamps Self-Authenticate

  April 15, 2026

  The Federal Rules of Evidence require proof that evidence is what you claim it is. Rule 901(a) calls this "authentication." For most digital evidence, that means witness testimony, chain of custody do…

• Chain of Custody for Digital Evidence in Insurance Disputes: What Claims Professionals Need to Know

  April 13, 2026

  A complete guide to maintaining defensible chain of custody for digital evidence in insurance claims, from initial documentation through litigation.…

← Back to ProofLedger